Summer on Campus

Additional Resources

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES

Anderson, H.M., J. Cain & E. Bird (2005).  Online student course evaluations: review of    literature and a pilot study.  American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69(1), 34-43.       www.ajpe.org/aj6901/aj690105/aj690105.pdf.

Avery, R. J., W. K. Bryant, A. Mathios, H. Kang & D. Bell (2006).  Electronic course evaluations: Does an online delivery system influence student evaluations?  Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 21-37.

Carini, R.M., J.C. Hayek, G.D. Kuh, J.M. Kennedy, & J.A. Ouimet (2003).  College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter?  Research in Higher Education 44(1), 1-19. 

Dommeyer, C. J., et al. (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online           surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations.  Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5),  611-623. doi: 10.1080/02602930410001689171.

Donovan, J., C. Mader, & J. Shinsky (2007).  Online vs. traditional course evaluation formats:         Student perceptions.  Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3), 158-180.  www.ncolr.org/jiol ISSN: 1541-4914.

Fike, D.S., D.J. Doyle & R.J. Connelly (2010).  Online vs. paper evaluations of faculty: When less   is just as good.  The Journal of Effective Teaching, 10(2), 42-54. From http://uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/Vol10_2/Fike.pdf

A fresh look at response rates: 9 best practices for colleges and universities moving to online course evaluations.  eXplorance.  Accessed March 2011.  Available:             http://www.ou.edu/content/dam/provost/documents/evaluations/evaluate-Response-Rates-White-Paper.pdf.

Gravestock, P. and Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008) Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends.  Toronto: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.

Hardy, N. (2003)  Online ratings: Fact and fiction.  New Directions for Teaching and Learning (96), 31-38.

Improving the process of course evaluation: The online alternative for Berkeley.  Leadership          Development Program, 2004-2005.  Accessed March 2012.  Available:             hrweb.berkeley.edu/sites/hrweb.berkeley.edu/files/.../05courseevaluation.doc

Johnson, T. Online student ratings: Will students respond? Paper presented at: American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2002.

Layne, B. H., J. R. DeCristoforo & D. McGinty (1999).  Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction.  Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 221-232.

Rochester Institute of Technology. (2011).  Online Course Evaluation (OCE) System.  Retrieved March 3, 2011. 

Sax, L. J., S. K. Gilmartin & A. N. Bryant (2003).  Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in Web and paper surveys.  Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432.

18 surefire ways to raise response rates to online evaluations.  Digital Measures.  Retrieved March 2012.  Available: 
https://www.digitalmeasures.com/login/dashboard/Course_Response_Raise_Response_Rates.pdf.

Winston-Salem State University

601 S. Martin Luther King Jr. Drive

Winston-Salem, NC 27110

Phone: (336) 750-2000



Library
Athletics
FOLLOW WSSU
FacebookTwitterYoutube
FlickrBlog
Copyright © 2010 Winston-Salem State University
Download Adobe Reader